TAGS: Marketing, Overseas
December 18, 2014
In the last two weeks, we’ve looked at some of the issues and problems facing NAFTA negotiators and the implications for farmers. This week, I’ll wander out on a limb to examine what I think are the most likely outcomes.
First, many of the minute details of specific items of debate could be solved quickly by cutting and pasting from the work already completed for the Trans-Pacific Partnership – TPP. All three NAFTA partners reached agreement on many issues including the contentious Canadian Dairy program. The odds of taking this shortcut are low however, because of the Trump administration aversion to any accomplishment from the Obama era.
Second, the big issue of content is probably overblown. Unless punitive tariffs are set extremely high, supply chains for autos for example will simply pass the cost of new tariffs on to customers, rather than alter where parts are coming from. A few percentage points won’t add any jobs.
Third, the Trump administration view of trade as zero-sum (I win, you lose), and its focus on quick results will handicap US negotiators, and make abandonment of the process more likely.
Fourth, tweets from the White House will confuse the process, and reinforce the global belief that any agreement could be repudiated overnight. Foreign trading partners are already creating alternate trading ties just in case. Farmers who are counting on the fact buyers “have to buy from us” should remember how much we liked that trading position for oil in the 80’s and how we invested and worked to reduce that dependency.
Fifth, there is disagreement among legal experts whether the president has the authority to unilaterally withdraw without a Congressional vote. That outcome would initiate a long and complex legal process, during which NAFTA could possibly remain…